BMW Foundation
Executive Summary: Energy Security Hub 2026

Energy has become the defining issue with regard to Europe’s security, prosperity, and global influence. As an official partner of the Munich Security Conference, the BMW Foundation convened a total of 750 international leaders from business, policy, science, and civil society to address this challenge head-on. Over three days, the Energy Security Hub 2026 provided a vibrant forum for strategic exchange. The main focus was on how Europe can mobilize technology, strengthen competitiveness, and forge global alliances to build a resilient energy and industrial future.
“Energy security is no longer treated as a technical issue. It has moved to the very center of the Munich Security Conference."
German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy

1. Transformation Amid Rising Demand
)


Energy Security Hub 2026 re-watch
2. Innovation Night: Technologies and Market Access
“Thinking about how the innovation and industrialization ecosystems come together, boldly across the Atlantic Ocean, that is the real key challenge.”
Kimmelman Professor and Director of the Precourt Institute for Energy at Stanford University

)
)
)
3. Competitive Energy Prices for New Growth


4. Is Europe Suffocating under the Weight of Regulations?
The second day of the Energy Security Hub began with a wake-up call. Europe, warned Narendra Taneja, President of the Independent Energy Policy Institute in India, “is still sleeping very comfortably on a soft pillow.” Arguing that Europe has not yet fully recognized that the transatlantic alliance has shifted fundamentally, his advice to Europeans was: “Take care of yourselves.” He encouraged Europe to build new partnerships with emerging economies such as India, the Middle East, and African countries. At the same time, Europe must recognize that these nations are self-confident and growing rapidly, demanding partnerships on equal terms and fair access to the EU single market.The EU urgently needs greater unity in the face of aggressive trade policies by major powers and additional competitors, said Dan Jørgensen, European Commissioner for Energy and Housing. The 27 member states remain too focused on national interests “instead of setting the energy transition as a common goal and pursuing the best and fastest route to achieve it.” It should be clear by now that only a united Europe can succeed in the global competition.
5. Raw Materials and Technologies

German Launch of the Edelman Trust Barometer 2026
A session on Friday (February 13) marked the German launch of the Edelman Trust Barometer 2026, presented by Edelman in cooperation with the Atlantik-Brücke. The conversation explored how trust has been shaped by geopolitical disruption, societal polarization, and economic uncertainty – and how it can be actively rebuilt. The session focussed on the role of leadership across business, politics, and society in restoring confidence, legitimacy, and social cohesion in Germany. One chart (below) showed that optimism for the future wanes. Globally, just 32% believe the next generation will be better off, with the biggest declines in India (-13 pts), and China (-13 pts) over the past year. Alarmingly, only 8% of people in Germany believe that the next generation will be better off than today – a decline of 6 points compared to the previous year.

8. Leap or Lose: The New Industrial Playbook for Europe

“For our industry, this is the worst time since at least 25 years. We have lost competitiveness in recent years, and we’ve lost it tremendously. In the last four years, 90,000 direct and indirect jobs in the chemical industry are already gone. The root cause is not China, it’s not the U.S., it’s not the Middle East, and it’s also not Russia. The main cause is the framework conditions in Europe. The increasing cost of carbon in Europe makes us completely uncompetitive against the rest of the world. All constructs to try to protect European industry against this imbalance are theoretically good constructs, but in practical terms will fail in the marketplace. At the end of the day, economics drive value chains out of Europe.”
“In the steel industry, we are very used to cycles. We have bad years every five years. But now this is a structural crisis. We can’t wait two years and then everything will be good again. This will not happen. So we need structural answers: safeguard steel products, lower energy prices, and a little less bureaucracy would help. It’s very important for all of us to really act now.”

)
“We definitely need change and the courage to embrace change. One thing is clear: if we remove certain processes, they are not reversible. They are gone. The processes and the employees and the jobs are gone. It’s not just a job of politics. It’s a common job of society, of business, and politics. We need to bring the forces, the power, together. We are at an inflection point, and if we don’t act now, it will be too late.”
“We are living in very challenging geopolitical times. The good thing is that we know what to do. The sad story is that some of this will take some time. The main meetings I have with stakeholders all over Europe, big companies, small companies, the first thing they bring to my table is the regulation, the overburden, the administrative burden, so that is my main focus. We also know that we need to tackle climate change. The main issue for a policymaker and a government is to protect its people and to protect it from risk, including biodiversity loss, water scarcity and climate change. We need to work together to push each other to actually act faster.”

8. Greater Protection for Critical Infrastructure

“We are closely monitoring Russian submarine activity near our undersea cables for energy and the internet. And we are keeping track of every move.”
Norwegian Minister of Defense


7. Net Zero Remains the Goal

8. Key Takeaways
- Energy Security as the Key to Europe’s Prosperity
Europe’s long-term economic strength depends on its ability to meet rising energy demands while lowering energy costs, protecting critical infrastructure, and securing reliable access to key raw materials and strategic technologies. Energy security and competitiveness are no longer separate objectives – they are mutually reinforcing pillars of resilience, sovereignty, and sustainable growth, forming the foundation of a future-proof society. - Europe Must Keep Pace with Major Powers
Outside the U.S.-China rivalry, a growing group of geopolitically influential states is leveraging great-power competition to expand its strategic control over energy, technology, and critical supply chains. To remain competitive and avoid losing ground, Europe must step up its efforts and assert its role in this evolving landscape. Europe needs the world, and the world needs Europe.
- Joint Strategies for a United European Powerhouse
Europe remains one of the world’s most attractive markets and a global economic powerhouse, home to world-class universities, leading research institutions, innovative companies, and deep capital markets. The challenge is not a lack of assets, but a lack of alignment and too little willingness to compromise in pursuit of greater unity. - Improving Frameworks for Scalable Net-Zero Technologies
To remain competitive, Europe must improve its ability to scale cleantech at industrial pace and establish clear guardrails for breakthrough technologies such as artificial intelligence and fusion energy. Greater unity and stronger coordination among EU member states are essential to translate Europe’s strengths into global leadership and ensure long-term prosperity.
- A European Energy Masterplan Using All Technologies
The goal remains clear: achieving net zero while strengthening Europe’s industrial base. This requires a diversified European energy master plan that accelerates the transition while ensuring stability, affordability, and broad and durable public support. Renewable expansion must be complemented by firm and flexible capacity to guarantee reliability. Until a fully integrated European power grid is in place, Europe must remain pragmatic and open to all viable technologies – including Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) – to bridge supply gaps, safeguard competitiveness, and support a resilient, future-proof society.

The New York Times Debate: Is Democracy Too Slow for the AI Race?
A full house cheered, laughed, and roared as an intellectual joust unfolded on stage on Saturday afternoon. In collaboration with the BWM Foundation, The New York Times brought "Debatable" to the Energy Security Hub with the motion: Is Democracy Too Slow for the AI Race? Stephen Dunbar-Johnson, President, International, The New York Times, kicked things off before passing the mic to Katrin Bennhold, host of "The World," to guide the audience through the fantastic session.Like true top debaters, the teams not only argued for and against the motion but also questioned its very framework. If it’s a race, what is the finish line? What do you win? The room filled with laughter and applause as the debate heated up. In the end, democracy won as the audience crowned the team arguing against the motion the winner.
























